Applying The Global Trigger Tool in a Turkey’s Hospital: in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Pilot Study

Keywords: adverse event, patient safety, global trigger tool, GGT, obstetric, gynecology

Abstract

The Global Trigger tool (GTT) is considered one of the most reliable methods in evaluating adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and potential of the GTT to identify AEs in clinical applications. 240 patient records were randomly selected from the Obstetrics and Gynecology department of a university hospital. Patient files were retrospectively examined as 20 patient files per month in a two-year period. The records were reviewed using GTT an approach developed by the American Institute for Health Development (IHI). Percentage of hospitalizations with AEs 9,58, AEs per thousand patient days 47.81, and AEs per thousand patient hospitalizations 95.83 were found. By applying GTT, 45 cases in category E (Damage is temporary and requires intervention) and 35 cases in category F (Damage is temporary and requires hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization) were detected. CRP elevation (5/11), vaginal surgeries (3/15), and use of Dynoprostone (6/22), helped detect AEs in category E (3 cases) and category F (11 cases). GTT detected 8.3 times more AEs than VRS. The application of the GTT is feasible in Clinical practice and a reliable and effective instrument for detecting AEs when adapted to the departmental specifics. High CRP, vaginal surgeries, and the use of vaginal Dynoprostone could be used as a trigger.

Author Biographies

Zeynep Ekici, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey

Provincial Quality coordinator, midwife, masters degree on health management

Mehmet Nurullah Kurutkan, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey

Department of Health Management, Associate prof.

References

Asavaroengchai, S., Sriratanaban, J., Hiransuthikul, N., & Supachutikul, A. (2010). Identifying adverse events in hospitalized patients using global trigger tool in Thailand. Asian Biomed, 3(5), 545-550.

Çakmak, C., Konca, M., & Teleş, M. (2018). Türkiye ulusal güvenlik raporlama sistemi (GRS) üzerinden tıbbi hataların değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 21(3), 423-448.

Frankos, V.H, Street, D.A, & O'neill, R.K. (2010). FDA regulation of dietary supplements and requirements regarding adverse event reporting. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 87(2), 239.

Grant, M. J. C., & Larsen, G. Y. (2007). Effect of an anonymous reporting system on near-miss and harmful medical error reporting in a pediatric intensive care unit. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 22(3), 213-221.

Griffin, F.A., & Resar, R.K. (2009). IHI Global Trigger Tool For Measuring Adverse Events (2nd ed). Ser. white Pap.

Harrison, W.D, Narayan, B, Newton, A.W, Banks, J.V, & Cheung, G. (2015). Litigation costs of wrong-site surgery and other non-technical errors in orthopaedic operating theatres. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 97(8), 592-597. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0045

Hooper, A. J., & Tibballs, J. (2014). Comparison of a Trigger Tool and voluntary reporting to identify adverse events in a paediatric intensive care unit. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 42(2), 199-206.

Howie, W. O. (2009) Mandatory reporting of medical errors: crafting policy and integrating it into practice. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 5(9), 649-654.

Hwang, J.I., Chin, H.J., & Chang, Y.S. (2014). Characteristics associated with the occurrence of adverse events: a retrospective medical record review using the Global Trigger Tool in a fully digitalized tertiary teaching hospital in Korea. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 20(1), 27-35.

Kirkendall, E. S., Kloppenborg, E., Papp, J., White, D., Frese, C., Hacker, D., & Kotagal, U. (2012). Measuring adverse events and levels of harm in pediatric inpatients with the Global Trigger Tool. Pediatrics, 130(5).

Klein, D. O., Rennenberg, R. J., Koopmans, R. P., & Prins, M. H. (2020). A Systematic Review of Methods for Medical Record Analysis to Detect Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients. Journal of Patient Safety.

Kohn, L.T, Corrigan, J.M, & ve Donaldson, M.S. (2000). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press, 6.

Kurutkan, M. N., Usta, E., Orhan, F., & Simsekler, M. C. (2015). Application of the IHI Global Trigger Tool in measuring the adverse event rate in a Turkish healthcare setting. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 27(1), 11-21.

Larsen, G. Y., Donaldson, A. E., Parker, H. B., & Grant, M. J. C. (2007). Preventable harm occurring to critically ill children. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: Society of Critical Care Medicine, 8(4), 331-336.

Leape, L.L. (2002). Reporting of adverse events. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347(20), 1633.

Mattsson, T. O., Knudsen, J. L., Brixen, K., & Herrstedt, J. (2014). Does adding an appended oncology module to the Global Trigger Tool increase its value? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26(5), 553-560.

McMillan, M, & Darcy, H. (2016). Adverse event surveillance in small animal anaesthesia: an intervention-based, voluntary reporting audit. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 43(2), 128-135.

Milch, C.E, Salem, D.N, Pauker, S.G, Lundquist, T.G, Kumar, S, & Chen, J. (2006). Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(2), 165-170.

O'Neil, A. C., Petersen, L. A., Cook, E. F., Bates, D. W., Lee, T. H., & Brennan, T. A. (1993). Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119(5), 370-376.

Resar, R. K., Rozich, J. D., & Classen, D. (2003). Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools. BMJ Quality & Safety, 12(suppl 2), 39- 45

Runciman, B., Merry, A., & Smith, A. M. (2001). Improving patients' safety by gathering information: anonymous reporting has an important role.

Rutberg, H., Risberg, M. B., Sjödahl, R., Nordqvist, P., Valter, L., & Nilsson, L. (2014). Characterisations of adverse events detected in a university hospital: a 4- year study using the Global Trigger Tool method. BMJ Open, 4(5).

Sağlık, Bakanlığı, SHGM (Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü). (2016) Güvenlik Raporlama Sistemi 2016 Yılı İstatistik ve Analiz Raporu. Sağlıkta Kalite ve Akreditasyon Daire Başkanlığı, Ankara.

Schwendimann, R., Blatter, C., Dhaini, S., Simon, M., & Ausserhofer, D. (2018). The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events–a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 521.

Silas, R, & Tibballs, J. (2010). Adverse events and comparison of systematic and voluntary reporting from a paediatric intensive care unit. BMJ Quality & Safety, 19(6), 568-571.

Thomas, E. J., Lipsitz, S. R., Studdert, D. M., & Brennan, T. A. (2002). The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136(11), 812-816.

Published
2023-12-01
How to Cite
1.
Ekici Z, Kurutkan MN, Ekici MA. Applying The Global Trigger Tool in a Turkey’s Hospital: in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Pilot Study. NHSJ [Internet]. 2023Dec.1 [cited 2024Feb.21];3(4):349-56. Available from: http://nhs-journal.com/index.php/nhs/article/view/148